University of Ghana — WAGMC patron profile
Supports biographical details for Osagyefuo Amoatia Ofori Panin and is used as a public institutional source, not as the palace register.
Ofori Panin FieResearch and contribution register Return homeEvidence before publication
This register shows what public sources can support, what remains disputed, and what only Ofori Panin Fie and recognised custodians can confirm. It is designed to make corrections and future review traceable.
Source register
Each source supports only the specific claim described. A public article is not treated as authority for an entire succession, jurisdiction or biography.
Supports biographical details for Osagyefuo Amoatia Ofori Panin and is used as a public institutional source, not as the palace register.
Names Adonten–Kukurantumi, Benkum–Begoro, Nifa–Asiakwa, Oseawuo–Wenkyi and Gyaase–Kwabeng, and reports the 25th-anniversary programme.
Describes Ohum as a two-day festival connected with the first yam harvest, thanksgiving and blessings for the coming year.
A syndicated public report says a football gala involved seven divisions. Because it does not provide a complete, authoritative list, it is retained as a review question rather than used to add names.
A major scholarly history used to frame research questions on state formation, governance and the modern period.
Provides a published research overview of the Okyeman Traditional Area. Administrative data must not be treated as proof of traditional boundaries.
Useful for current municipal and district context. Government administrative units are kept separate from traditional divisions and jurisdictions.
Do not present as settled fact
Request to the Secretary and IT team
Confirm whether the Palace wishes to adopt, review, rename or decline the project, and identify the officer who may approve content.
Provide the official succession register, verified divisions and towns, approved biographies, festival records and source notes.
Review hosting, domain, security, staff access, backups, privacy and the process for publishing authorised statements.
Identify approved photographs, captions, dates, photographers and reuse permissions before publication.
Possible institutional support
These are public institutions and research bodies, not confirmed project partners. Any approach should be made transparently and with palace knowledge where appropriate.
Responsible funding scope
A reviewed budget could cover archival research, document scanning, oral-history recording, image rights, translation, secure hosting, backups, accessibility, staff training and long-term maintenance. Until an authorised sponsor or account is confirmed, the platform should describe needs without collecting funds.